When It’s Not A Part: Understanding an OPI in Parts Work

Graphic representing Resource State theory, alongside a INtrojects and Other Personalised Introject (OPI), demonstrating the difference between parts of the personality and an internal presence experienced as not belonging to the self in Resource Therapy.

For therapists working with trauma, parts, and complexity

A Subtle and Critical Moment In Therapy

Sometimes in therapy, there’s a moment that doesn’t quite fit. You’re with a client. The work is flowing. And then something shifts.

The tone changes.
The language sharpens.
The energy feels… different.

And if you’re really attuned, there’s often a quiet internal signal:

“Hmm ..I’m not quite speaking to my client right now.”

It’s easy to dismiss. But clinically, this moment matters.

Because not everything that appears in a session belongs to the personality.

What Is Resource Therapy? (And Why This Distinction Matters)

Resource Therapy is an attachment-informed, trauma-focused, action-based parts therapy developed by Professor Gordon Emmerson.

It provides therapists with:

  • a clear map of which part is at the helm
  • a structured way to identify 8 clinical pathologies
  • 15 targeted treatment actions for direct intervention

Unlike many parts models, Resource Therapy is not just about insight.

👉 It is about knowing what to do next in the room

Not Everything Present Is A Part

In Resource Therapy, we work primarily with Resource States (parts). So do EMDR Therapists, CBT workers and ACT psychotherapists.

These are aspects of the personality that:

  • belong to the person
  • hold emotional and sensory experience
  • can be accessed, processed, and resolved

But here is the clinical edge:

👉 Not everything present in the system is a Resource State

And when we assume it is, we risk working in the wrong place.

What Is An OPI (Other Personalised Introject)?

An OPI (Other Personalised Introject) is:

an internalised “other” that is experienced as separate from the self, and not part of the personality system

This is where Resource Therapy differs from many other parts-based approaches.

Rather than treating all internal experiences as parts, RT distinguishes between:

  • Resource States (parts)
  • Introjects (internalised relational imprints)
  • OPIs (not part of the personality)

How To Recognise An OPI In Session

OPIs have a distinct clinical feel.

You may notice:

  • Third-person language
  • Feels like a Perpetrator
    • “She’s useless”
  • A rigid, repetitive voice
  • A strong sense of “this is not me”
  • An intrusive or “other” quality
  • A feeling that you are speaking to someone else

This is not metaphor.

It is a clinical observation.

Common Mistake: Treating Everything As A Part

Most therapists are trained to respond to internal experiences by:

  • exploring them
  • integrating them
  • or healing them

And often, this works.

But when the experience is actually an OPI:

👉 This approach can slow the work down significantly

You may notice:

  • circular conversations
  • lack of shift
  • client confusion
  • therapist uncertainty

Not because the work is wrong.

Because the target is wrong.

The Resource Therapy Parts Distinction

Resource Therapy brings clarity through structure:

Resource States (Parts)

  • Belong to the self
  • Hold emotion and experience
  • Can be healed and integrated

Introjects

  • Internalised relational messages
  • Held within a Resource State
  • Worked through the part that carries them

OPIs

  • Not part of the self
  • Experienced as “other”
  • Can be engaged and leave

👉 This distinction allows for precision-based therapy

What To Do When It’s Not A Part

When an OPI is identified, the clinical stance shifts.

In Resource Therapy, we:

  • clarify what is present
  • check whether it belongs to the client
  • engage it directly if needed using the OPI protocol
  • support its separation from the system

We do not:

  • treat it as a part
  • attempt integration
  • or process it as a trauma state

What Clients Experience After OPI Work

When this is done well, the shift can be immediate.

Clients often report:

  • a sense of internal quiet and a sense of feeling lighter, unburdened
  • increased clarity
  • reduced internal conflict
  • relief that feels disproportionate to the time spent

This is not insight-based change.

👉 It is a structural change in the system

Why This Matters For Trauma Work

For therapists working with:

  • complex trauma
  • attachment disruptions
  • dissociation
  • internal conflict

This distinction is critical.

Because precision:

  • reduces overwhelm
  • increases safety
  • accelerates resolution

Learn Resource Therapy Clinical Resource Therapy Program (Full Qualification)

If this way of working resonates, the next step is learning the model in a structured way.

A clear, practical introduction to:

  • identifying Resource States
  • understanding RT language
  • beginning to apply interventions

Clinical Resource Therapy Program (Full Qualification)

Our 10-day training covers:

  • all 8 RT pathologies
  • The 15 treatment actions for a clinical roadmap
  • direct access work
  • trauma resolution using parts
  • Relieving OPI’s – Day 9

Training is delivered online and in person through the
Australia Resource Therapy Institute – click here to discover the Parts work of the Clinical Resource Therapy Program

Reflections of a Parts Therapist

In therapy, we are trained to ask:

👉 What is happening here?

Resource Therapy invites a more precise question:

👉 What is here… and does it actually belong to the system?

Because when we get that right:

The work becomes clearer.
Faster.
And deeply effective.

Philipa Thornton
President – Resource Therapy International
Director – Australia Resource Therapy Institute

Why is Resource Therapy the Missing Link In Parts-Based Trauma Treatment According to Psychology?

A comparative infographic illustrating Gordon Emmerson's Resource Therapy as a structured clinical sequence for parts work. On the left, a purple and magenta energetic nebula represents "Traditional Parts Work," marked with a compass, keys, and swirling paths labeled "EMPATHETIC INSIGHTS," "DEEP COMPASSION," and "SLOW EXPLORATION." A central bridge labeled "EMMERSON'S PATHFINDER" connects to the right side, which is a blue geometric interface for "EMMERSON'S CLINICAL METHOD (SYSTEMATIC ACTION)." This section displays a numbered 4-step process: 1) Diagnosis of Parts, 2) Identification of State, 3) Targeted Interventions, and 4) Anchoring in Normal State. This structured sequence culminates in a central glowing target with large text below reading "DIRECT CORE ISSUE RESOLUTION," with a subtitle "A DEFINITIVE CLINICAL SEQUENCE." The entire graphic is set on a futuristic metal panel background.

Parts work therapies have reshaped how clinicians understand trauma, dissociation, and emotional distress.

Yet many approaches remain either conceptually elegant but clinically diffuse. Or effective but lacking a structured intervention map.

Resource Therapy (RT), developed by Professor Gordon Emmerson Phd, offers a distinct contribution, a precision-based, action-oriented model that integrates parts theory with direct, targeted intervention.

As a trauma-informed, attachment-focused psychologist, I suggest Resource Therapy is a missing link in contemporary trauma treatment, bridging the gap between insight and resolution through structured, parts-specific clinical actions.


Potentially, is there a Quiet Gap in Parts-Based Therapy

Parts work is powerful.
But it can also become… slow, wrapped in Resourcing rather than resolution.

Exploratory. Insight-rich. Cognitive. Lacking Affect.
Sometimes beautifully compassionate… and still not resolving the core issue.

Therapists often find themselves:

  • understanding the client’s parts’ intentions, getting them offside
  • mapping internal systems clearly, not knowing they have been talking to the same part
  • building strong internal relationships, but no external change

…and yet, the original emotional charge remains.

That’s the gap.

Not a failure of parts therapy. A missing layer of precision.


Where Current Models Shine & Where They Struggle

Models like Internal Family Systems (IFS) have brought enormous value to the field:

  • normalising multiplicity
  • reducing shame
  • creating internal safety
  • strengthening compassionate awareness

The Ego State Therapy Model has been brilliant in:

  • utilising psychodynamic aspects in therapy
  • reducing symptomology
  • using hypnosis clinically
  • strengthening compassionate awareness

These are essential foundations.

But in practice, many clinicians quietly encounter limitations:

  • Parts are understood, but not shifted
  • Trauma is approached indirectly rather than resolved
  • Sessions become process-heavy without clear endpoints
  • Change relies on insight rather than targeted intervention

This is not a criticism.

It’s an observation from the therapy room.


What Resource Therapy Does Differently

Resource Therapy shifts the question from:

“What part is here?”

to:

“What state is this part in? And what specifically needs to happen next?”

This is a fundamental shift. RT introduces:

  • State-based diagnosis
  • Defined pathology conditions
  • Structured treatment actions
  • Direct access to the part responsible

Rather than staying in relational exploration, RT moves toward clinical precision. Informed by a solid theory of personality via a parts lens.


The Power Of State-Specific Work

One of Gordon Emmerson’s (2014) most significant contributions to Parts work is RT’s classification of internal states into specific conditions:

  • Normal, healthy parts with suitable skills and abilities for the situation
  • Vaded States – holding Fear, Rejection, Disappointment, Confusion
  • Dissonant State
  • Retro States
  • Conflicted States

This matters more than it first appears.

Because once you know the state‘s condition, you know the RT intervention.

Not broadly.

Specifically.

Infographic comparing traditional parts work to Emmerson's Resource Therapy. The left side features a purple swirl labeled 'Traditional Parts Work' with icons for deep compassion and slow exploration. A central 'Emmerson’s Pathfinder' bridge leads to a blue, high-tech interface on the right titled 'Clinical Method.' This side lists a 4-step sequence: Diagnosis, Identification of State (Retro, Normal, V-State), Targeted Interventions, and Anchoring. A central glowing target signifies 'Direct Core Issue Resolution.'
Bridging the Gap: While traditional parts work offers deep empathy, Emmerson’s Resource Therapy provides the “Pathfinder”. A definitive clinical sequence designed to move beyond slow exploration and into direct core issue resolution.

From Insight To Accessing Resolution

Many therapies stop at:

“I understand why I feel this way.”

Resource Therapy moves to:

“This part no longer needs to feel this way.”

And that shift is everything.

RT is built around 15 treatment actions, each designed for a specific therapeutic task:

  • accessing the relevant state
  • activating the emotional experience
  • linking to the origin (bridging)
  • facilitating expression and empowerment
  • resolving unmet attachment needs
  • updating the internal system

This is where RT aligns strongly with the science of memory reconsolidation.

Not just coping.

Not just insight.

Actual updating of the emotional learning. In accordance with Bruce Ecker’s Memory Reconsolidation Principles (Ecker, et al., 2024) for neurobiological change.


Direct Parts Access is a Game Changer

One of the most clinically impactful differences in RT is this:

Therapists do not speak about parts.
They speak directly to the part.

This removes layers of abstraction and diffusion.

No lengthy negotiation.
No reliance on intermediary processes where another part is talking from its experience of the other part.

Instead:

“Can I speak directly with the part of you that feels this fear?”

This immediacy often leads to:

  • faster access to core material
  • clearer emotional activation
  • more efficient resolution

For many therapists, this is the moment things click.


Trauma Parts Work That Actually Lands

In trauma treatment, this precision matters.

Because trauma is not just a story.
It is a state-dependent emotional experience.

RT works directly with:

  • The part that holds the fear
  • The part that carries the rejection
  • The part that never processed the experience

And crucially…

It resolves negative beliefs and past emotional burdens, not just manages the symptoms.


Why Does This Matter Now?

We are in a moment where:

  • Trauma-informed therapy is expanding rapidly
  • Therapists are seeking deeper, faster, and more reliable outcomes
  • Clients are more informed and expect meaningful change rapidly

The field doesn’t need more theory.

It needs:

  • clarity
  • structure
  • effectiveness

Resource Therapy offers exactly that.


A Model That Integrates – Not Competes

RT is not positioned as a replacement for other models.

It integrates seamlessly with:

  • EMDR
  • CBT
  • Schema Therapy
  • Somatic approaches

Because it answers a different question:

Not just what is happening
but what do we do with it, right now, in this session?


The Real Contribution

Gordon Emmerson’s contribution is not just another parts model.

It is this:

He turned parts work into a clinical method.

A road map.

A clinical sequence.

A set of treatment decisions therapists can actually follow.


Final Thoughts

Resource Therapy fills a critical gap in parts-based trauma treatment.

It brings together:

  • The relational depth of parts work
  • The precision of structured intervention
  • The neurobiological alignment of memory reconsolidation

For therapists who want to move beyond understanding into resolution,
RT offers something rare:

A way to work directly, effectively, and with clarity.


References

Emmerson, G. (2014). Resource therapy. Old Golden Point Press.

Ecker, B., Ticic, R., & Hulley, L. (2024). Unlocking the emotional brain. Routledge.

Resource Therapy for Therapists: A Practical Guide to Parts Work, EMDR and Trauma Treatment

resource-therapy-parts-work-emdr-trauma wheel ship parts metaphor

If you are a therapist working with trauma, attachment wounds, dissociation, shame, avoidance, and blocked processing, you have probably had moments where you can feel the pain is close, but the part of the person carrying it is not yet fully reachable.

That is where Resource Therapy can feel so helpful.

Resource Therapy, or RT, is described by its official organisations as a strengths-based, trauma-informed, parts-based psychotherapy that works directly with personality parts, known as Resource States, and uses targeted treatment actions to support change (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.). Rather than speaking only to the whole person in broad terms, RT helps us identify the specific part that is distressed, protective, confused, avoidant, or carrying an unresolved burden.

For clinicians trained in EMDR, Ego State Therapy, Internal Family Systems, or other trauma approaches, RT can be understood as a practical parts-based clinical framework. Its central question is both simple and powerful: which part is present, what is happening for that part, and what intervention is likely to help most right now?

That clarity is one of the reasons many therapists are drawn to it.

What Is Resource Therapy?

Resource Therapy was developed by Professor Gordon Emmerson, PhD, and is presented as a psychotherapy model that works directly with personality states or parts. Official descriptions emphasise that it is action-oriented, client-centred, and organised around 15 treatment actions (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

In other words, RT is not only about understanding parts. It is also about knowing what to do with them in therapy.

This is what makes RT so appealing. It is compassionate, respectful, and deeply human, while also offering therapists a clear structure. Rather than staying only in broad exploratory conversation, RT invites us to ask three very practical questions in the room:

  • Which part is here now?
  • What is happening for you part?
  • What intervention is most appropriate next?

When a session feels emotionally charged, stuck, or confusing, that kind of structure can be incredibly grounding.

How Does Resource Therapy Relate to Ego State Therapy?

Resource Therapy is best understood as historically connected to, but distinct from, Ego State Therapy.

Ego State Therapy laid important foundations for working with differentiated parts of personality, especially in relation to trauma, conflict, and dissociation (Watkins & Watkins, 1997). Emmerson later expanded this tradition into a more structured clinical model with its own language, formulation style, and treatment actions (Emmerson, 2008, 2014).

That matters because it allows us to honour RT’s roots while also recognising that it is now a model in its own right.

How Is Resource Therapy Different From IFS?

Resource Therapy and Internal Family Systems both sit within the wider family of parts-based psychotherapies. IFS describes an internal system made up of parts and places strong emphasis on healing through relationship with those parts and access to Self (Schwartz, 1995; Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021).

Resource Therapy differs mainly in clinical style and structure. IFS is often experienced as more relational, exploratory, and Self-led. RT, by contrast, is generally presented as more direct, diagnostic, and action-based, with the therapist identifying the presenting Resource State and selecting a targeted treatment action accordingly (Emmerson, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

That does not make one model better than the other. It simply means they organise therapeutic attention differently.

For many trauma therapists, RT’s appeal lies in the fact that it can offer a clearer pathway when a session feels diffuse, conflicted, or blocked.

The Ship Metaphor: Captain And Crew

One of the reasons RT is so teachable, and so easy for clients to understand, is the ship metaphor.

In RT, we often think of the personality as a ship. Different parts of the self come to the wheel at different times. Some are calm, capable, wise, and well suited to the moment. Others may be frightened, ashamed, confused, avoidant, reactive, or driven by old protective learning.

The therapist’s task is not to judge the crew. It is to understand who is currently steering, what burden that part is carrying, and what it needs in order to settle, heal, or step back so that a more resourced part can come forward.

This metaphor is clinically useful because it helps both therapists and clients move away from global shame. Instead of asking, What is wrong with me? a person can begin to ask, Which part of me is at the helm right now, and why?

That shift alone can be regulating.

What Are The Main Problem States In Resource Therapy?

One of the things that gives RT its clinical usefulness is that it distinguishes between different kinds of state-based problems. In practice, RT clinicians commonly formulate difficulties in terms such as fear, rejection, disappointment, confusion, avoidance, conflict, and parts that are activated in the wrong context (Emmerson, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

These distinctions matter because they help us move beyond the vague sense that “a part is upset” and towards a more precise clinical question:

What is the nature of the problem for this part?

That kind of differentiation is one reason RT is often experienced as practical. It gives the therapist a clearer map.

Why Might Trauma Therapists Find Resource Therapy Useful?

Many trauma clients describe a painful split between what they know and what they feel.

They may say things like:

  • “I know I’m safe, but part of me still panics.”
  • “I understand why I do this, but I still can’t stop.”
  • “Part of me wants connection, and another part shuts everything down.”
  • “It feels like different parts of me are fighting.”

This is where parts-based models can be especially helpful. They allow the therapist to work with the specific part carrying the distress, rather than relying only on insight or cognitive understanding (Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021; Watkins & Watkins, 1997).

RT is particularly relevant here because its official training organisations explicitly describe it as a trauma-informed model that works directly with the part holding pain, protection, or unresolved experience (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

It is still important to speak carefully. RT can reasonably be presented as a clinically useful trauma framework, but stronger claims about outcomes should be stated cautiously unless they are backed by broader independent research.

Resource Therapy And EMDR

EMDR is a structured psychotherapy with a clearly defined eight-phase framework, including history taking, preparation, assessment, desensitisation, installation, body scan, closure, and re-evaluation (EMDR International Association, 2021; Shapiro, 2018).

That matters because many therapists notice that trauma processing can become blocked by fear, dissociation, avoidance, or internal conflict. In complex trauma and dissociative presentations, the stabilisation and preparation phase becomes especially important (van der Hart et al., 2013).

This is one reason RT may be clinically complementary to EMDR for therapists who already think in terms of parts, dissociation, and blocked processing (Hase, 2021; van der Hart et al., 2013).

I would still avoid claiming that RT is the missing piece for EMDR. That is a stronger claim than the current evidence base supports. But it is fair to say that many therapists may find RT a valuable companion model when formulation, stabilisation, or part-specific understanding is needed.

Resource Therapy And Memory Reconsolidation

Memory reconsolidation has become an important lens for understanding how therapeutic change may occur. Lane, Ryan, Nadel, and Greenberg (2015) argue that change across multiple psychotherapies may involve the updating of prior emotional memories when new emotional experiences occur.

This offers a helpful way of thinking about RT. When a therapist helps a client access a specific Resource State, activate the emotional learning held there, and introduce a new corrective experience, that process is conceptually consistent with reconsolidation-informed ideas about change (Lane et al., 2015).

Careful wording matters here too. It is safer to say that RT is compatible with, or can be understood through, memory reconsolidation theory than to claim that RT itself has already been fully established by direct reconsolidation research.

Why Many Therapists Find RT Practical

One of the reasons therapists are drawn to RT is that it speaks to the real questions that arise in session:

  • Which part or state is here right now?
  • Is this fear, rejection, disappointment, confusion, avoidance, or conflict?
  • What is this part needing?
  • What intervention is most appropriate next?

That practical orientation is central to RT’s appeal. It does not require therapists to abandon everything they already know. Instead, it can sit alongside trauma therapy, EMDR-informed work, somatic approaches, and other parts-based models as a way of increasing clarity and specificity in the room.

For many of us, that is deeply relieving.

We do not always need a whole new philosophy. Sometimes we need a map that helps us understand who is on deck, what burden they are carrying, and how to help.

Takeaways

Resource Therapy is best understood as a parts-based, trauma-informed, clinically structured, brief psychodynamic psychotherapy that developed from ego state traditions and offers therapists a direct way of working with differentiated personality states (Emmerson, 2008, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

For therapists already working with trauma, dissociation, attachment injury, shame, blocked processing, or internal conflict, RT may offer a very useful map. It sits comfortably in conversation with IFS, EMDR, and reconsolidation-informed psychotherapy, while maintaining its own language and clinical structure.

At present, the strongest support for RT lies in its conceptual clarity, its published clinical texts, and its training framework. Where stronger empirical claims are made, those are best stated cautiously until a broader independent research base becomes available.

If you have ever sat with a client and felt that the pain was close, but not yet quite reachable, Resource Therapy may offer a clinically meaningful way to ask:

Who is holding this distress, what is happening for that part, and what may help next?

Frequently Asked Questions About Resource Therapy

What Is Resource Therapy In Simple Terms?

Resource Therapy is a parts-based psychotherapy that helps therapists work directly with different personality parts, called Resource States, to address fear, shame, confusion, avoidance, and internal conflict (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

Is Resource Therapy The Same As Ego State Therapy?

No. Resource Therapy developed from ego state traditions, but it has its own terminology, structure, and treatment model (Emmerson, 2008, 2014; Watkins & Watkins, 1997).

How Is Resource Therapy Different From IFS?

Both are parts-based models, but IFS is generally more relational and Self-led, while RT is typically more direct and treatment-focused in its clinical style (Schwartz, 1995; Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021; Emmerson, 2014).

Can Resource Therapy Be Integrated With EMDR?

It can be integrated conceptually and clinically by therapists who work with parts, dissociation, and blocked processing, especially where stabilisation and formulation are important (Hase, 2021; van der Hart et al., 2013).

What Issues Can Resource Therapy Help Therapists Work With?

Official RT sources present it as useful across trauma-related distress, shame, anxiety, confusion, avoidance, internal conflict, and other presentations involving differentiated parts or Resource States.

Some RT materials also discuss applications to addictions, depression, and related difficulties, though those broader outcome claims should be framed carefully (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

Do Therapists Need Training In Resource Therapy?

Yes. As with any structured psychotherapy model, training is important for safe, ethical, and competent clinical use.

Ready To Learn More?

If you are a therapist wanting a clearer, more direct way to work with parts, trauma, dissociation, and blocked processing, our Clinical Resource Therapy training offers a practical, structured path into the model.

You will learn how to identify the part that is present, understand the nature of the problem it is carrying, and apply targeted treatment actions in a way that is compassionate, ethical, and clinically effective.

Explore the training and discover how Resource Therapy can deepen your trauma work, strengthen your parts-based practice, and give you more confidence in the therapy room.

Author Bio

Philipa Thornton is a psychologist, President of Resource Therapy International, and Director of the Australia Resource Therapy Institute. She trains therapists in Resource Therapy in Australia and internationally, with a special interest in trauma, parts work, attachment, and Imago couples therapy.


References

Australia Resource Therapy Institute. (n.d.). What is Resource Therapy? Retrieved March 16, 2026, from https://resourcetherapy.com.au/about/

EMDR International Association. (2021, August 13). The eight phases of EMDR therapy. https://www.emdria.org/blog/the-eight-phases-of-emdr-therapy/

Emmerson, G. (2008). Ego state therapy. Crown House Publishing.

Emmerson, G. (2014). Resource therapy. Old Golden Point Press.

Hase, M. (2021). The structure of EMDR therapy: A guide for the therapist. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 660753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660753

Lane, R. D., Ryan, L., Nadel, L., & Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000041

Resource Therapy International. (n.d.). Resource Therapy International. Retrieved March 16, 2026, from https://resourcetherapy.com/

Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal family systems therapy. Guilford Press.

Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2021). Internal family systems therapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

van der Hart, O., Groenendijk, M., González, A., Mosquera, D., & Solomon, R. (2013). Dissociation of the personality and EMDR therapy in complex trauma-related disorders: Applications in the stabilization phase. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 7(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.7.2.81

Watkins, J. G., & Watkins, H. H. (1997). Ego states: Theory and therapy. W. W. Norton.

Resource Therapy Institute newsletter

We'll send you updates on courses, training and appearances.

* = required field

No spam and unsubscribe at any time

Subscribe!