Trauma-Informed Therapy – Page 2 – Australia Resource Therapy Institute

April 6, 2026April 6, 2026

When Every Part Has a Story: Supporting Healing in Resource Therapy

Clinical Resource Therapist with a client discussing Resource Therapy in session

As therapists, we sit with complexity every day. Clients often describe feeling pulled in different directions. One part of them wants change, another holds back. One part longs for connection, another expects harm.

We are often witnessing a system of resource states. It is not resistance. These states do exactly what they have learned to do to manage and survive.

For me, Resource Therapy (RT) has offered a way of understanding this. It is not something to fix. It is something to listen to. My work has shaped how I understand the internal system.

Clinical Resource Counsellor in her office using parts work with a client — Jaclyn Hall, Clinical Resource Therapist and Trainer

It has also shaped how I respond to the present resource state. When we slow down, what becomes clear is this: every resource state has a story.

I’ve never been drawn to ways of working that centre heavily on diagnosis or pathologising. It’s not that understanding patterns isn’t important but framing people through what is “wrong” with them has never felt like it honours the depth of what they’ve lived through.

I’ve always been interested in understanding what’s happened to a person, how they’ve survived, and what has supported them to get through.

Importantly, what they are now wanting to shift so they can live from a place of their own choosing, rather than from responses that may no longer be serving them.

Resource Therapy aligns deeply with this.

Resource Therapy Diagnosis

While RT includes classification of resource states, I don’t experience this as labelling the person. Rather, classification helps guide the therapeutic process. It supports the therapist in understanding the function of the part. This knowledge helps to select appropriate RT therapeutic actions.

At its core, RT is concerned with understanding function, not assigning fault.

RT understands personality as a system of resource states. At any given time, one resource state is in the conscious, the part that is present and engaging. Each resource state holds its own experiences, responses, and role within the system.

Each part has a purpose. Parts outdated behaviours or heavy emotions can easily be understood in the context of what a person has lived through.

This has influenced the way I listen. Rather than moving too quickly toward change, I am listening for which state is in the conscious, and what that state is ready to change today.

In my opinion, one of the most meaningful moments in therapy is when a resource state feels understood.

Often, what presents is not just a thought or behaviour, but a lived internal experience that has been carried, at times, for many years.

A look, a tone, a moment of disconnection can activate something younger, perhaps a resource state holding the experience of not mattering, of being too much, or not enough.

A state that learned to retreat, fight to be heard, to stay quiet, or to hold everything inside.

When we offer compassionate responses, like saying, “That makes so much sense… this state has taken on this role, and has worked to protect in this way,” we can notice a shift.

The system may soften. The urgency may reduce. Shame appears to lessen. Not because anything has been “fixed,” but because something this part carries has been understood and acknowledged. This often leads to opening a doorway to deeper healing.

My Experience of this Parts Therapy

In my Clinical work as a therapist and supervisor of counsellors, I have had the privilege of hearing the stories of highly insightful clients who have understood their history. Many who could see the links between what has happened and how they respond now.

Yet, they have continued to seek more from their healing journey, but something hadn’t quite clicked.

What I have come to understand is that insight alone does not necessarily lead to change. Why? Because insight often comes from a different resource state, knowledge and not the part holding the distress and emotional pain.

Resource Therapy provides a way of working directly with the resource state holding the experience, which is where shifts may begin to occur.

This is a key component to therapeutic change.

This is especially vital in trauma work, where protective resource states are often strong. They may avoid, distract, control, or limit access to distressing material. From the outside, these may come across as barriers.

Within RT, they are understood as serving an important function. These states have developed for a reason. They are doing what they have learned to do, to protect the system.

In RT, we work with them in a trauma-informed manner. We seek to understand their role. We respect their function. We support the conditions for other resource states to come into the conscious when appropriate. This supports safety, pacing, and readiness within the work.

What this can feel like internally is not always easy to capture in clinical language. At times, it is better understood through the expressed lived experience held within a resource state.

Here is a poem written from my heart:

I have a need,
I ask for care.
I see your look,
and freeze mid-air.

I know that pain—
the silent sting,
“I’m inconvenient,
I don’t mean a thing.”

“Why don’t I matter?”
races through my mind.
I shrink, retreat,
no safe space to find.

A smile appears:
“hold your head up high,”
but inside echoes
the young one’s cry.

Healing whispers:
You can hold them now.
Call on your parts,
they will show you how.

To sit with pain,
release the shame,
to hold them close,
and speak their name.

Your worth is not
their gaze, their tone—
your feelings are valid,
they are your own.

Sitting quietly, strengthening inside,
finding the strength that was always mine,

Each breath a reminder,
each moment proof—
healing is living
your authentic truth.

Resource Therapy has deeply influenced the way I understand both people and the process of therapeutic change.

It has deepened my focus on listening to the system, to the resource state that is present, and to what may be needed in that moment.

We participate in this work by honouring the story of each Resource State. When that story is deeply heard, something can shift. There can be less shame, more compassion and a greater capacity for change. Not by overriding the system, but by working with it.

Written by Jaclyn Hall, Mental Health Professional
PACFA Accredited Clinical Counsellor and Supervisor
Advanced Clinical Resource Therapist and Trainer
EMDRAA Accredited EMDR Practitioner
Founder and Director: Calm, Connect & Heal Therapeutic Services (Click link for Jaclyn’s website)

Thanks, Jaclyn, we appreciate your sharing your vast experience and knowledge with this insightful guest article. We appreciate hearing from other therapists’ parts therapy adventures. Want to share yours? Reach out today.

Want to learn the latest developments in parts therapy? Join us at our next training, with online and hybrid options to suit your needs. Click here for Professional Parts Therapy workshops.

March 16, 2026April 6, 2026

Resource Therapy for Therapists: A Practical Guide to Parts Work, EMDR and Trauma Treatment

resource-therapy-parts-work-emdr-trauma wheel ship parts metaphor

If you are a therapist working with trauma, attachment wounds, dissociation, shame, avoidance, and blocked processing, you have probably had moments where you can feel the pain is close, but the part of the person carrying it is not yet fully reachable.

That is where Resource Therapy can feel so helpful.

Resource Therapy, or RT, is described by its official organisations as a strengths-based, trauma-informed, parts-based psychotherapy that works directly with personality parts, known as Resource States, and uses targeted treatment actions to support change (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.). Rather than speaking only to the whole person in broad terms, RT helps us identify the specific part that is distressed, protective, confused, avoidant, or carrying an unresolved burden.

For clinicians trained in EMDR, Ego State Therapy, Internal Family Systems, or other trauma approaches, RT can be understood as a practical parts-based clinical framework. Its central question is both simple and powerful: which part is present, what is happening for that part, and what intervention is likely to help most right now?

That clarity is one of the reasons many therapists are drawn to it.

What Is Resource Therapy?

Resource Therapy was developed by Professor Gordon Emmerson, PhD, and is presented as a psychotherapy model that works directly with personality states or parts. Official descriptions emphasise that it is action-oriented, client-centred, and organised around 15 treatment actions (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

In other words, RT is not only about understanding parts. It is also about knowing what to do with them in therapy.

This is what makes RT so appealing. It is compassionate, respectful, and deeply human, while also offering therapists a clear structure. Rather than staying only in broad exploratory conversation, RT invites us to ask three very practical questions in the room:

Which part is here now?
What is happening for you part?
What intervention is most appropriate next?

When a session feels emotionally charged, stuck, or confusing, that kind of structure can be incredibly grounding.

How Does Resource Therapy Relate to Ego State Therapy?

Resource Therapy is best understood as historically connected to, but distinct from, Ego State Therapy.

Ego State Therapy laid important foundations for working with differentiated parts of personality, especially in relation to trauma, conflict, and dissociation (Watkins & Watkins, 1997). Emmerson later expanded this tradition into a more structured clinical model with its own language, formulation style, and treatment actions (Emmerson, 2008, 2014).

That matters because it allows us to honour RT’s roots while also recognising that it is now a model in its own right.

How Is Resource Therapy Different From IFS?

Resource Therapy and Internal Family Systems both sit within the wider family of parts-based psychotherapies. IFS describes an internal system made up of parts and places strong emphasis on healing through relationship with those parts and access to Self (Schwartz, 1995; Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021).

Resource Therapy differs mainly in clinical style and structure. IFS is often experienced as more relational, exploratory, and Self-led. RT, by contrast, is generally presented as more direct, diagnostic, and action-based, with the therapist identifying the presenting Resource State and selecting a targeted treatment action accordingly (Emmerson, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

That does not make one model better than the other. It simply means they organise therapeutic attention differently.

For many trauma therapists, RT’s appeal lies in the fact that it can offer a clearer pathway when a session feels diffuse, conflicted, or blocked.

The Ship Metaphor: Captain And Crew

One of the reasons RT is so teachable, and so easy for clients to understand, is the ship metaphor.

In RT, we often think of the personality as a ship. Different parts of the self come to the wheel at different times. Some are calm, capable, wise, and well suited to the moment. Others may be frightened, ashamed, confused, avoidant, reactive, or driven by old protective learning.

The therapist’s task is not to judge the crew. It is to understand who is currently steering, what burden that part is carrying, and what it needs in order to settle, heal, or step back so that a more resourced part can come forward.

This metaphor is clinically useful because it helps both therapists and clients move away from global shame. Instead of asking, What is wrong with me? a person can begin to ask, Which part of me is at the helm right now, and why?

That shift alone can be regulating.

What Are The Main Problem States In Resource Therapy?

One of the things that gives RT its clinical usefulness is that it distinguishes between different kinds of state-based problems. In practice, RT clinicians commonly formulate difficulties in terms such as fear, rejection, disappointment, confusion, avoidance, conflict, and parts that are activated in the wrong context (Emmerson, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

These distinctions matter because they help us move beyond the vague sense that “a part is upset” and towards a more precise clinical question:

What is the nature of the problem for this part?

That kind of differentiation is one reason RT is often experienced as practical. It gives the therapist a clearer map.

Why Might Trauma Therapists Find Resource Therapy Useful?

Many trauma clients describe a painful split between what they know and what they feel.

They may say things like:

“I know I’m safe, but part of me still panics.”
“I understand why I do this, but I still can’t stop.”
“Part of me wants connection, and another part shuts everything down.”
“It feels like different parts of me are fighting.”

This is where parts-based models can be especially helpful. They allow the therapist to work with the specific part carrying the distress, rather than relying only on insight or cognitive understanding (Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021; Watkins & Watkins, 1997).

RT is particularly relevant here because its official training organisations explicitly describe it as a trauma-informed model that works directly with the part holding pain, protection, or unresolved experience (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

It is still important to speak carefully. RT can reasonably be presented as a clinically useful trauma framework, but stronger claims about outcomes should be stated cautiously unless they are backed by broader independent research.

Resource Therapy And EMDR

EMDR is a structured psychotherapy with a clearly defined eight-phase framework, including history taking, preparation, assessment, desensitisation, installation, body scan, closure, and re-evaluation (EMDR International Association, 2021; Shapiro, 2018).

That matters because many therapists notice that trauma processing can become blocked by fear, dissociation, avoidance, or internal conflict. In complex trauma and dissociative presentations, the stabilisation and preparation phase becomes especially important (van der Hart et al., 2013).

This is one reason RT may be clinically complementary to EMDR for therapists who already think in terms of parts, dissociation, and blocked processing (Hase, 2021; van der Hart et al., 2013).

I would still avoid claiming that RT is the missing piece for EMDR. That is a stronger claim than the current evidence base supports. But it is fair to say that many therapists may find RT a valuable companion model when formulation, stabilisation, or part-specific understanding is needed.

Resource Therapy And Memory Reconsolidation

Memory reconsolidation has become an important lens for understanding how therapeutic change may occur. Lane, Ryan, Nadel, and Greenberg (2015) argue that change across multiple psychotherapies may involve the updating of prior emotional memories when new emotional experiences occur.

This offers a helpful way of thinking about RT. When a therapist helps a client access a specific Resource State, activate the emotional learning held there, and introduce a new corrective experience, that process is conceptually consistent with reconsolidation-informed ideas about change (Lane et al., 2015).

Careful wording matters here too. It is safer to say that RT is compatible with, or can be understood through, memory reconsolidation theory than to claim that RT itself has already been fully established by direct reconsolidation research.

Why Many Therapists Find RT Practical

One of the reasons therapists are drawn to RT is that it speaks to the real questions that arise in session:

Which part or state is here right now?
Is this fear, rejection, disappointment, confusion, avoidance, or conflict?
What is this part needing?
What intervention is most appropriate next?

That practical orientation is central to RT’s appeal. It does not require therapists to abandon everything they already know. Instead, it can sit alongside trauma therapy, EMDR-informed work, somatic approaches, and other parts-based models as a way of increasing clarity and specificity in the room.

For many of us, that is deeply relieving.

We do not always need a whole new philosophy. Sometimes we need a map that helps us understand who is on deck, what burden they are carrying, and how to help.

Takeaways

Resource Therapy is best understood as a parts-based, trauma-informed, clinically structured, brief psychodynamic psychotherapy that developed from ego state traditions and offers therapists a direct way of working with differentiated personality states (Emmerson, 2008, 2014; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

For therapists already working with trauma, dissociation, attachment injury, shame, blocked processing, or internal conflict, RT may offer a very useful map. It sits comfortably in conversation with IFS, EMDR, and reconsolidation-informed psychotherapy, while maintaining its own language and clinical structure.

At present, the strongest support for RT lies in its conceptual clarity, its published clinical texts, and its training framework. Where stronger empirical claims are made, those are best stated cautiously until a broader independent research base becomes available.

If you have ever sat with a client and felt that the pain was close, but not yet quite reachable, Resource Therapy may offer a clinically meaningful way to ask:

Who is holding this distress, what is happening for that part, and what may help next?

Frequently Asked Questions About Resource Therapy

What Is Resource Therapy In Simple Terms?

Resource Therapy is a parts-based psychotherapy that helps therapists work directly with different personality parts, called Resource States, to address fear, shame, confusion, avoidance, and internal conflict (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

Is Resource Therapy The Same As Ego State Therapy?

No. Resource Therapy developed from ego state traditions, but it has its own terminology, structure, and treatment model (Emmerson, 2008, 2014; Watkins & Watkins, 1997).

How Is Resource Therapy Different From IFS?

Both are parts-based models, but IFS is generally more relational and Self-led, while RT is typically more direct and treatment-focused in its clinical style (Schwartz, 1995; Schwartz & Sweezy, 2021; Emmerson, 2014).

Can Resource Therapy Be Integrated With EMDR?

It can be integrated conceptually and clinically by therapists who work with parts, dissociation, and blocked processing, especially where stabilisation and formulation are important (Hase, 2021; van der Hart et al., 2013).

What Issues Can Resource Therapy Help Therapists Work With?

Official RT sources present it as useful across trauma-related distress, shame, anxiety, confusion, avoidance, internal conflict, and other presentations involving differentiated parts or Resource States.

Some RT materials also discuss applications to addictions, depression, and related difficulties, though those broader outcome claims should be framed carefully (Australia Resource Therapy Institute, n.d.; Resource Therapy International, n.d.).

Do Therapists Need Training In Resource Therapy?

Yes. As with any structured psychotherapy model, training is important for safe, ethical, and competent clinical use.

Ready To Learn More?

If you are a therapist wanting a clearer, more direct way to work with parts, trauma, dissociation, and blocked processing, our Clinical Resource Therapy training offers a practical, structured path into the model.

You will learn how to identify the part that is present, understand the nature of the problem it is carrying, and apply targeted treatment actions in a way that is compassionate, ethical, and clinically effective.

Explore the training and discover how Resource Therapy can deepen your trauma work, strengthen your parts-based practice, and give you more confidence in the therapy room.

Author Bio

Philipa Thornton is a psychologist, President of Resource Therapy International, and Director of the Australia Resource Therapy Institute. She trains therapists in Resource Therapy in Australia and internationally, with a special interest in trauma, parts work, attachment, and Imago couples therapy.

References

Australia Resource Therapy Institute. (n.d.). What is Resource Therapy? Retrieved March 16, 2026, from https://resourcetherapy.com.au/about/

EMDR International Association. (2021, August 13). The eight phases of EMDR therapy. https://www.emdria.org/blog/the-eight-phases-of-emdr-therapy/

Emmerson, G. (2008). Ego state therapy. Crown House Publishing.

Emmerson, G. (2014). Resource therapy. Old Golden Point Press.

Hase, M. (2021). The structure of EMDR therapy: A guide for the therapist. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 660753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660753

Lane, R. D., Ryan, L., Nadel, L., & Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000041

Resource Therapy International. (n.d.). Resource Therapy International. Retrieved March 16, 2026, from https://resourcetherapy.com/

Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal family systems therapy. Guilford Press.

Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2021). Internal family systems therapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Shapiro, F. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

van der Hart, O., Groenendijk, M., González, A., Mosquera, D., & Solomon, R. (2013). Dissociation of the personality and EMDR therapy in complex trauma-related disorders: Applications in the stabilization phase. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 7(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1891/1933-3196.7.2.81

Watkins, J. G., & Watkins, H. H. (1997). Ego states: Theory and therapy. W. W. Norton.

February 20, 2026February 20, 2026

➡️ If Positive Affirmations have ever made you feel Worse instead of better, it’s not you. Psychology says..

Woman standing at a ship’s wheel at sunrise representing inner psychological parts and the captain of the moment, illustrating why positive affirmations can fail and how curiosity based self talk supports change in Resource Therapy. website text www.resourcetherapy.com.au

Positive affirmations can help or hinder. This depends on which part of the inner crew is responding. Understanding this makes all the difference.

We hear phrases like “I am confident”, “I am calm”, or “I am successful” repeated often.

These phrases are treated as universal truths. It is believed they simply need enough repetition to become real. For some people, they help.

For others, they create an immediate inner reaction that sounds more like, “No, you’re not.”

If you have ever felt that tension, you are not failing at affirmations.

You are experiencing something deeply human, and very understandable when we look through both psychology and a Resource Therapy lens.

Meet the Founder of Positive Affirmations

The modern use of affirmations is often traced back to Émile Coué. He was a French pharmacist and psychologist. Coué developed the idea of conscious autosuggestion in the early twentieth century. His well-known phrase was:

“Every day, in every way, I am getting better and better.”

Coué noticed that repeated inner language appeared to influence people’s expectations, motivation, and behaviour. While the language sounds simple, the principle is powerful. The way we speak to ourselves shapes where attention goes, and attention influences action.

From a Resource Therapy perspective, we might say the captains voice a part of sets the direction.

The Psychology behind Why Affirmations Backfire

One of the most common misunderstandings is the idea that affirmations work equally well for everyone. Research tells a different story.

Wood, Perunovic, and Lee (2009) found that positive self-statements may improve mood for some people. For others, it feels worse. This effect is particularly evident when the statement clashes.

If a vulnerable part feels scared or inadequate, it can create internal tension. Repeating a statement that feels untrue can lead to conflict rather than confidence.

Daniel Wegner’s research on ironic mental processes helps explain why. When we try to force the mind into a certain state, the brain automatically monitors whether we are succeeding. Ironically, this monitoring process can make the unwanted feeling more visible and stronger (Wegner, 1994, 1997).

So when a person says, “I am calm”, an anxious part may instantly respond, “But are we really????” That response is not resistance in a negative sense. It is the mind trying to keep psychological coherence.

In Resource Therapy language, a different Resource State may simply be at the wheel, and it is not convinced by the message being offered.

Why a Small shift Changes Everything

Instead of telling your inner crew what to believe, try inviting curiosity.

Rather than saying:

“I am confident.”

Try asking:

“Why am I becoming more confident?”

Your parts will listen and answer your Why.

This subtle change is supported by research on the question behaviour effect. The research shows that questions can increase motivation. They can encourage goal-consistent behaviour because the mind naturally searches for answers (Senay, Albarracín, & Noguchi, 2010).

Questions feel less like commands and more like invitations. They allow space for parts that are uncertain or protective to participate without being overridden.

My Personal Moment

Years ago, I began experimenting with this approach in my own life. Instead of repeating fixed statements about love or relationships, I shifted to gentle questions.

“Why am I attracting a deeply supportive partner?”

Nothing dramatic happened overnight. What changed was quieter and more meaningful. I noticed things differently. My wiser parts made clearer choices. I had the right parts out to respond to situations with more alignment and less fear. Read my anxiously attached parts weren’t at the helm!

And somewhere along the way, I met and built a life with the man of my dreams my husband, Chris Paulin.

It was not magic. It was the gradual alignment of intention, awareness, and behaviour and getting my inner crew on board.

What Psychology tells us about what Works

Self affirmation theory reminds us that affirmations are most effective when they connect to genuine values and identity. They are less effective when based on unrealistic positivity – lets face it the Pollyanna factor is pressure(Cohen & Sherman, 2014).

When language feels emotionally believable, the nervous system relaxes rather than argues. Our parts have choices.

This aligns beautifully with Resource Therapy principles. We do not silence the parts that feel scared, doubtful, or protective. We listen to them. We work with them. The goal is cooperation, not suppression.

Affirmations become powerful when they sound like something the inner crew can actually accept.

How to Use Affirmations in a way that feels Real

Use language that feels possible rather than exaggerated.
Turn statements into questions to invite curiosity.
Notice which Resource State is present when resistance appears.
Pair words with grounding, breath, or body awareness.
Focus on gentle direction rather than perfection.

If a phrase triggers an internal argument, pause and listen to each voice. That reaction is information, not failure.

Round Up

Positive affirmations are not about pretending everything is perfect. They are about shaping attention in a direction that supports growth. When your inner crew feels respected rather than pushed, change becomes calmer, steadier, and more sustainable.

Your mind is always listening. The real question is not whether affirmations work. The question is how you are speaking to the parts of yourself that need to feel safe enough to move forward.

Frequently Asked Questions About Positive Affirmations

Do positive affirmations really work?

They can, especially when they feel believable and align with personal values. Affirmations that feel unrealistic may create internal resistance instead of motivation.

Why do affirmations sometimes make people feel worse?

Research shows that when a statement clashes with a person’s internal beliefs, it can increase discomfort. The mind may automatically argue against what feels untrue.

What works better than traditional affirmations?

For many people, turning affirmations into questions works better because questions invite curiosity and reduce inner resistance.

How does a parts based approach help?

A parts based approach recognises that different inner states hold different perspectives. Instead of forcing change, it supports cooperation between parts, making growth feel safer and more natural.

What is the easiest way to start?

Choose one area of growth and try a gentle question such as, “Why am I getting a little better at this?” Then notice what your mind begins to show you.

References (APA Style)

Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371.

Coué, É. (1922). Self mastery through conscious autosuggestion.

Emmerson, G. (2015). Learn Resource Therapy: Clinical qualification student training manual. Old Golden Point Press.

Senay, I., Albarracín, D., & Noguchi, K. (2010). Motivating goal directed behaviour through introspective self talk: The role of the interrogative form of simple future tense. Psychological Science, 21(4), 499–504.

Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52.

Wegner, D. M. (1997). Ironic processes of mental control. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–19). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wood, J. V., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Positive self statements: Power for some, peril for others. Psychological Science, 20(7), 860–866.